Home Jobs Contact Us Sitemap iStateLink
Stateside Associates  

2300 Clarendon Boulevard, 4th Floor
Arlington, Virginia 22201
Phone: (703) 525-7466
Fax: (703) 525-7057

About Stateside AssociatesIssue Intelligence ServicesIssue Management ServicesDo You Need A Lobbyist?About The Fifty StatesPublications

Today:
Millions online
Tomorrow:
Billions online
Information wants to be free.
 
Volume 2, Number 3 April 10, 2002
 

Creating the "Go To" Site: Keeping the Content Fresh With a Discussion Forum

One of the most daunting challenges when managing an issue advocacy Web site is to keep the content fresh and timely. To achieve long-term success, these sites must be positioned as a "go to" resource for lawmakers, news media, and citizens concerned about the issue at hand. No matter how impressed these audiences may be with the site upon their first visit, if they fail to find new and compelling content on subsequent visits, they will stop using it. This results in the lost opportunity to affect the debate, as the Web site will cease to be a factor in shaping the language and tone of how people talk about the issue. One way to keep the content on your site fresh and timely without creating an overwhelming burden for your issue managers and Web master is to create a forum for your audience to post and exchange ideas.

Using community building tools, such as a message board or discussion forum, on an issue advocacy Web site can dramatically increase the utility of the site. For example, including an issue-focused message board on an advocacy site allows visitors to post questions and observations. These postings spur responses by other site visitors. By monitoring and occasionally participating in the forum, the issue manager responsible for maintaining this forum can collect valuable issue information from the postings, answer questions, and respond to misstatements and criticisms. Used this way, the forum becomes a very versatile and powerful issue management tool that simultaneously keeps the content on the site fresh and worth revisiting time and time again.

These issue forums should be used strategically. For example, a forum placed in the public section of a Web site will yield benefits and require management that differs from a forum placed behind a member's only password. These differences are due to distinct characteristics of the audiences. The audience for the public section of the site will include lawmakers, news media, activists, and concerned citizens. This audience will not always be supportive of your policy goals. While it is possible, and generally advisable, to monitor and edit the discussion to assure civility, rather than delete critical postings, it is often more persuasive to answer to them with clear, compelling and well-evidenced responses. The more honest this discussion, the more likely lawmakers and the media will observe and participate in it. Remember, since this forum is hosted on your issue advocacy site, the discussion is always framed by text and links to materials that support your policy agenda. This gives you the "home field advantage," and thus insulates you, to a great extent, from the negative comments.

If the forum is placed behind a password, then the audience is more likely to be pure supporters, such as members of an association. At the same time, such discussions will be inaccessible to lawmakers, news media, and concerned citizens, so the impact of these discussions on general Web site traffic and the tone of the policy debate will be minimized. Such forums are useful for developing internal strategy and for gathering sensitive intelligence. That being said, it is sometimes advisable to provide password access to specific targeted audiences, like lawmakers and news media, to these protected forums…or to a forum specifically created for them. This serves to expose these decision-makers and opinion leaders to the discussion and your perspectives, while providing them with a special incentive to use your site to learn about the policy issue.

While there are many ways to keep the content on an issue site fresh and timely, community forums are among the easiest. They provide so many advantages-intelligence gathering, community building, fresh and timely content; encourage return visits, etc.-that the disadvantages are often easily outweighed.

Online Advocacy Tips:
Creating the "Go To" Site: Community Produced Content

1. Keep content on issue advocacy site fresh and timely by providing forums for audience contributions
2. Create public forums for lawmakers, news media and concerned citizens
3. Create private forums for special audiences (members, invited lawmakers, invited new media, etc.)
4. Allow both sides to post comments (with editing, for civility)
5. Issue manager monitors and participates in forum to keep discussion focused on your agenda
6. Frame forum with text and links highlighting your policy agenda


 


Home | About Us | Issue Intelligence |Issue Management |
Lobbyist Services | About the Fifty States |Publications
Copyright 2008 Stateside Associates