| Arkansas |
| Contact |
Tom Hunting, Inspector
Department of Pollution and Ecology
901-682-0985 |
 |
| Citation |
ADPCE Regulation 12,
Chapter 2, Section 1 adopts the federal regulations by reference. |
 |
| Record keeping: Are
hard copies of test results required or are electronic results
adequate? If hard copies are required, what are the availability
requirements. |
Hard copies must be
available at the time of inspection, however 24-hour notice
is given before inspection.
If records cannot be produced at the time of inspection, the
Department will usually allow 30 days for the records to be
produced without penalty. Hard copies need to be available for
inspection that would be conducted during business hours.
The Department prefers records to be available at all times
in case there is a release. |
 |
| Recordkeeping: Are
there other release detection recordkeeping requirements besides
tightness test results? If so, who is responsible, when must
they be performed, and where must they be stored. |
Records must include:
1) all written performance claims of the system, 2) results
of any sampling, testing, or monitoring for the past year, and
3) documentation of all calibration, maintenance and repair.
40 CFR280.45. |
 |
| Are there any start-up
or operational (one time or on-going) permitting, licensing,
inspecting, certifying, calibrating, maintaining, or reporting
(test results, electronic system alarms, etc.) requirements
for the operator(or owner if different)? |
An amended notification
form must be filed if the release detection is modified. 40
CFR 280.22. |
 |
| Are there training
requirements for Operators? Owners(if different)? |
There are no training
requirements. |
 |
| Is an annual .1 gph
test (i.e., 40CFR 280.44b) required in addition to a 0.2 gph
Monthly Monitoring test (i.e. CFR 280.44c; 280.43h)--
or vice versa? |
No, either test may
be used. |
 |
| What are the penalties/ramifications
for not getting every monthly test (tank/line) due to high volume
of business and/or site conditions (ground water fluctuations,
heavy traffic, construction, release detection equipment failure,
etc.) that prevent the system from getting a passing test each
month? |
Possible $10,000 fine,
but the Department will usually give the facility 3- days to
get into compliance without penalty. Regulation 12 Chapter 8. |
 |
| Are periodic (i.e.,
annual) third party inspection/certification test(s) required
to verify that the Monthly Monitoring leak detection
system is operating properly? If the answer is yes, what are
the specific requirements of this/these periodic inspections?
Must an inspection form be submitted to the state/or retained
at the store? Must the inspecting contractor be state certified? |
No periodic third party
is required. |
 |
| What are the effective
dates of all release detection system requirements? Are these
dates the same for all stores or can they be store specific
(i.e., as stated on a permit to install a new tank or tanks
or on a tank registration form)? |
Release detection was
and is required for all new (installed after December
22, 1988), tanks and piping upon installation.
Release detection was required for all existing
(installed prior to December 22, 1988), tanks and suction piping
by December 22, 1993.
Release detection was required for existing (installed
prior to December 22, 1988), pressurized piping by December
22, 1990. |
 |
| Can the required line
leak detector test (40 CFR 280.44a) be preformed by the onsite
electronic system self-test or is a third party
test required? |
A self test is sufficient
as long as it is an approved system and it is operated in accordance
with the manufacturers instructions. |
 |
| Must lines and/or leak
detectors be tested if a component of the line, such as a shear
valve, is damaged and must be repaired or replaced? If so, can
the test be performed by the on-site electronic systems
self-test or is a third party test required? |
Testing is required,
but a self-test is sufficient. 40 CFR 280.33 (d) |
 |
| Are third-party testing
contractors to tightness test tanks or lines required (or use
some other method of release detection other than electronic
release detection such as ground water monitoring, statistical
inventory reconciliation, etc.) even through an electronic release
detection system in installed and operated to meet federal requirements?
If so, would this apply to all tanks and piping or would it
apply to just certain tanks and lines such as those that are
single walled or those with high water tables or those at a
store where there was previous ground contamination that is
currently being mitigated, etc.? |
Third party testing
is not required. |
 |
| Cities and Municipalities
with different requirements. |
None. |